You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geographic and Genetic Population Differentiation of the Amazonian Chocolate Tree (Theobroma cacao L)
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003311 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan C. Motamayor, Philippe Lachenaud, Jay Wallace da Silva e Mota, Rey Loor, David N. Kuhn, J. Steven Brown, Raymond J. Schnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 767 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | <1% |
Colombia | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 5 | <1% |
Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | <1% |
Unknown | 738 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 132 | 17% |
Researcher | 121 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 94 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
Other | 114 | 15% |
Unknown | 193 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 325 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 33 | 4% |
Engineering | 31 | 4% |
Chemistry | 21 | 3% |
Other | 78 | 10% |
Unknown | 218 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#837,604
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,039
of 223,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,749
of 101,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#28
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.