↓ Skip to main content

The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s38488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta Marini, Roberto Buffa, Bruno Saragat, Alessandra Coin, Elena Debora Toffanello, Linda Berton, Enzo Manzato, Giuseppe Sergi

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate whether bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) can be a suitable technique for the assessment of sarcopenia. We also investigate the potential use of specific BIVA as an indicator of sarcopenic obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Sports and Recreations 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 53 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#548
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,971
of 286,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.