↓ Skip to main content

Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roux-en-Y versus Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012998.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Nishizaki, Riki Ganeko, Nobuaki Hoshino, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama, Toshi A Furukawa, Yoshiharu Sakai, Norio Watanabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 48 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 54 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,735,191
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,265
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,867
of 428,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.