↓ Skip to main content

Discalculia do desenvolvimento: avaliação da representação numérica pela ZAREKI-R

Overview of attention for article published in Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discalculia do desenvolvimento: avaliação da representação numérica pela ZAREKI-R
Published in
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, June 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0102-37722011000200003
Authors

Paulo Adilson da Silva, Flávia Heloísa dos Santos

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Unknown 17 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 17 74%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,258,711
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
#59
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,503
of 111,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them