↓ Skip to main content

PERT: A Method for Expression Deconvolution of Human Blood Samples from Varied Microenvironmental and Developmental Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PERT: A Method for Expression Deconvolution of Human Blood Samples from Varied Microenvironmental and Developmental Conditions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002838
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenlian Qiao, Gerald Quon, Elizabeth Csaszar, Mei Yu, Quaid Morris, Peter W. Zandstra

Abstract

The cellular composition of heterogeneous samples can be predicted using an expression deconvolution algorithm to decompose their gene expression profiles based on pre-defined, reference gene expression profiles of the constituent populations in these samples. However, the expression profiles of the actual constituent populations are often perturbed from those of the reference profiles due to gene expression changes in cells associated with microenvironmental or developmental effects. Existing deconvolution algorithms do not account for these changes and give incorrect results when benchmarked against those measured by well-established flow cytometry, even after batch correction was applied. We introduce PERT, a new probabilistic expression deconvolution method that detects and accounts for a shared, multiplicative perturbation in the reference profiles when performing expression deconvolution. We applied PERT and three other state-of-the-art expression deconvolution methods to predict cell frequencies within heterogeneous human blood samples that were collected under several conditions (uncultured mono-nucleated and lineage-depleted cells, and culture-derived lineage-depleted cells). Only PERT's predicted proportions of the constituent populations matched those assigned by flow cytometry. Genes associated with cell cycle processes were highly enriched among those with the largest predicted expression changes between the cultured and uncultured conditions. We anticipate that PERT will be widely applicable to expression deconvolution strategies that use profiles from reference populations that vary from the corresponding constituent populations in cellular state but not cellular phenotypic identity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 218 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 18%
Computer Science 28 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Engineering 14 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 29 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,443,044
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,412
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,446
of 288,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#44
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.