↓ Skip to main content

Human Perception of Fear in Dogs Varies According to Experience with Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
44 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Perception of Fear in Dogs Varies According to Experience with Dogs
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Wan, Niall Bolger, Frances A. Champagne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 28 14%
Psychology 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#580,465
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,887
of 225,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,049
of 291,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#145
of 4,887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.