You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Twitter of Babel: Mapping World Languages through Microblogging Platforms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0061981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delia Mocanu, Andrea Baronchelli, Nicola Perra, Bruno Gonçalves, Qian Zhang, Alessandro Vespignani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 151 | 13% |
| United States | 127 | 11% |
| Spain | 89 | 7% |
| Kuwait | 74 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 38 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 3% |
| Ireland | 25 | 2% |
| Canada | 20 | 2% |
| France | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 202 | 17% |
| Unknown | 421 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1066 | 89% |
| Scientists | 84 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 34 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 235 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 22% |
| Researcher | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 65 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 26% |
| Unknown | 35 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 856. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,674
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#344
of 226,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96
of 211,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#7
of 5,164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.