↓ Skip to main content

Is It Easy to Be Urban? Convergent Success in Urban Habitats among Lineages of a Widespread Native Ant

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is It Easy to Be Urban? Convergent Success in Urban Habitats among Lineages of a Widespread Native Ant
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean B. Menke, Warren Booth, Robert R. Dunn, Coby Schal, Edward L. Vargo, Jules Silverman

Abstract

The most rapidly expanding habitat globally is the urban habitat, yet the origin and life histories of the populations of native species that inhabit this habitat remain poorly understood. We use DNA barcoding of the COI gene in the widespread native pest ant Tapinoma sessile to test two hypotheses regarding the origin of urban populations and traits associated with their success. First, we determine if urban samples of T. sessile have a single origin from natural populations by looking at patterns of haplotype clustering from across their range. Second, we examine whether polygynous colony structure--a trait associated with invasion success--is correlated with urban environments, by studying the lineage dependence of colony structure. Our phylogenetic analysis of 49 samples identified four well supported geographic clades. Within clades, Kimura-2 parameter pairwise genetic distances revealed <2.3% variation; however, between clade genetic distances were 7.5-10.0%, suggesting the possibility of the presence of cryptic species. Our results indicate that T. sessile has successfully colonized urban environments multiple times. Additionally, polygynous colony structure is a highly plastic trait across habitat, clade, and haplotype. In short, T. sessile has colonized urban habitats repeatedly and appears to do so using life history strategies already present in more natural populations. Whether similar results hold for other species found in urban habitats has scarcely begun to be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 120 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 29%
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Master 17 13%
Other 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 61%
Environmental Science 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,896,705
of 24,844,992 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#150,912
of 215,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,458
of 175,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#563
of 679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,844,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.