↓ Skip to main content

Taking ART to Scale: Determinants of the Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy in 45 Clinical Sites in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taking ART to Scale: Determinants of the Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy in 45 Clinical Sites in Zambia
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliot Marseille, Mark J. Giganti, Albert Mwango, Angela Chisembele-Taylor, Lloyd Mulenga, Mead Over, James G. Kahn, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer

Abstract

We estimated the unit costs and cost-effectiveness of a government ART program in 45 sites in Zambia supported by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research Zambia (CIDRZ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 30%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 11%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,636,996
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,672
of 219,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,063
of 292,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#881
of 4,890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.