You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How effective are social distancing policies? Evidence on the fight against COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0257363 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrich Glogowsky, Emanuel Hansen, Simeon Schächtele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| Turkey | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| San Marino | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 93% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#330,282
of 26,067,272 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,660
of 227,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,323
of 439,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#67
of 2,545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,067,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.