You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social foraging in vampire bats is predicted by long-term cooperative relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001366 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon P. Ripperger, Gerald G. Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| Colombia | 5 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 59% |
| Scientists | 30 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1307. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#10,293
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#31
of 9,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#421
of 437,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.