↓ Skip to main content

Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
876 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007457.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vlasta Vodopivec-Jamsek, Thyra de Jongh, Ipek Gurol-Urganci, Rifat Atun, Josip Car

Abstract

Preventive health care promotes health and prevents disease or injuries by addressing factors that lead to the onset of a disease, and by detecting latent conditions to reduce or halt their progression. Many risk factors for costly and disabling conditions (such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases) can be prevented, yet healthcare systems do not make the best use of their available resources to support this process. Mobile phone messaging applications, such as Short Message Service (SMS) and Multimedia Message Service (MMS), could offer a convenient and cost-effective way to support desirable health behaviours for preventive health care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 876 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 833 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 179 20%
Researcher 148 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 16%
Unspecified 83 9%
Student > Bachelor 68 8%
Other 255 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 341 39%
Unspecified 128 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 11%
Psychology 83 9%
Social Sciences 78 9%
Other 153 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#688,902
of 13,533,030 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,185
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,518
of 250,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,533,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.