The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved fire severity mapping in the North American boreal forest using a hybrid composite method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rse2.238 |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Holsinger, Sean A. Parks, Lisa B. Saperstein, Rachel A. Loehman, Ellen Whitman, Jennifer Barnes, Marc‐André Parisien |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 63% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,893,711
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#113
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,555
of 435,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.