↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 5,948)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
383 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, January 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoni K. Ashar, Alan Gordon, Howard Schubiner, Christie Uipi, Karen Knight, Zachary Anderson, Judith Carlisle, Laurie Polisky, Stephan Geuter, Thomas F. Flood, Philip A. Kragel, Sona Dimidjian, Mark A. Lumley, Tor D. Wager

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 718 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 383 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 39 10%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Master 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 80 21%
Unknown 145 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Psychology 41 11%
Neuroscience 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 159 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1789. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,791
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#18
of 5,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288
of 520,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.