You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tradeoffs in marine reserve design: habitat condition, representation, and socioeconomic costs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Letters, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/conl.12005 |
Authors |
Carissa J. Klein, Vivitskaia J. Tulloch, Benjamin S. Halpern, Kimberly A. Selkoe, Matthew E. Watts, Charles Steinback, Astrid Scholz, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
American Samoa | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 24% |
Researcher | 34 | 21% |
Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 61 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 32% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#230,107
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#68
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,528
of 292,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.