You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
How Common is Dry Mouth? Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Prevalence Estimates
Brazilian Dental Journal, December 2018
Bernardo Antonio Agostini, Graziela Oro Cericato, Ethieli Rodrigues da Silveira, Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimento, Francine dos Santos Costa, Willian Murray Thomson, Flavio Fernando Demarco
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||15||14%|
|Student > Master||9||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||8||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||41||39%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||3||3%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 437,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them