↓ Skip to main content

Social Cognition, the Male Brain and the Autism Spectrum

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Cognition, the Male Brain and the Autism Spectrum
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Hall, Ruth C. M. Philip, Katie Marwick, Heather C. Whalley, Liana Romaniuk, Andrew M. McIntosh, Isabel Santos, Reiner Sprengelmeyer, Eve C. Johnstone, Andrew C. Stanfield, Andy W. Young, Stephen M. Lawrie

Abstract

Behavioral studies have shown that, at a population level, women perform better on tests of social cognition and empathy than men. Furthermore Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs), which are characterized by impairments in social functioning and empathy, occur more commonly in males than females. These findings have led to the hypothesis that differences in the functioning of the social brain between males and females contribute to the greater vulnerability of males to ASD and the suggestion that ASD may represent an extreme form of the male brain. Here we sought to investigate this hypothesis by determining: (i) whether males and females differ in social brain function, and (ii) whether any sex differences in social brain function are exaggerated in individuals with ASD. Using fMRI we show that males and females differ markedly in social brain function when making social decisions from faces (compared to simple sex judgements) especially when making decisions of an affective nature, with the greatest sex differences in social brain activation being in the inferior frontal cortex (IFC). We also demonstrate that this difference is exaggerated in individuals with ASD, who show an extreme male pattern of IFC function. These results show that males and females differ significantly in social brain function and support the view that sex differences in the social brain contribute to the greater vulnerability of males to ASDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 31%
Neuroscience 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 43 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#826,189
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,907
of 223,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,194
of 290,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#204
of 4,847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.