You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Hollow polydopamine nanoparticles loading with peptide RL-QN15: a new pro-regenerative therapeutic agent for skin wounds
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2021
Huiling Sun, Ying Wang, Tiantian He, Dingwei He, Yan Hu, Zhe Fu, Yinglei Wang, Dandan Sun, Junsong Wang, Yixiang Liu, Longjun Shu, Li He, Ziwei Deng, Xinwang Yang
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||18%|
|Student > Master||1||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||9%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||9%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 433,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.