You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influenza Vaccination Guidelines and Vaccine Sales in Southeast Asia: 2008–2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0052842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinay Gupta, Fatimah S. Dawood, Charung Muangchana, Phan Trong Lan, Anonh Xeuatvongsa, Ly Sovann, Remigio Olveda, Jeffery Cutter, Khin Yi Oo, Theresia Sandra Diah Ratih, Chong Chee Kheong, Bryan K. Kapella, Paul Kitsutani, Andrew Corwin, Sonja J. Olsen |
| Abstract |
Southeast Asia is a region with great potential for the emergence of a pandemic influenza virus. Global efforts to improve influenza surveillance in this region have documented the burden and seasonality of influenza viruses and have informed influenza prevention strategies, but little information exists about influenza vaccination guidelines and vaccine sales. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,490,142
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,466
of 193,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,066
of 280,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,112
of 4,857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.