↓ Skip to main content

Laughing Rats Are Optimistic

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
41 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laughing Rats Are Optimistic
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafal Rygula, Helena Pluta, Piotr Popik

Abstract

Emotions can bias human decisions- for example depressed or anxious people tend to make pessimistic judgements while those in positive affective states are often more optimistic. Several studies have reported that affect contingent judgement biases can also be produced in animals. The animals, however, cannot self-report; therefore, the valence of their emotions, to date, could only be assumed. Here we present the results of an experiment where the affect-contingent judgement bias has been produced by objectively measured positive emotions. We trained rats in operant Skinner boxes to press one lever in response to one tone to receive a food reward and to press another lever in response to a different tone to avoid punishment by electric foot shock. After attaining a stable level of discrimination performance, the animals were subjected to either handling or playful, experimenter-administered manual stimulation - tickling. This procedure has been confirmed to induce a positive affective state in rats, and the 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (rat laughter) emitted by animals in response to tickling have been postulated to index positive emotions akin to human joy. During the tickling and handling sessions, the numbers of emitted high-frequency 50-kHz calls were scored. Immediately after tickling or handling, the animals were tested for their responses to a tone of intermediate frequency, and the pattern of their responses to this ambiguous cue was taken as an indicator of the animals' optimism. Our findings indicate that tickling induced positive emotions which are directly indexed in rats by laughter, can make animals more optimistic. We demonstrate for the first time a link between the directly measured positive affective state and decision making under uncertainty in an animal model. We also introduce innovative tandem-approach for studying emotional-cognitive interplay in animals, which may be of great value for understanding the emotional-cognitive changes associated with mood disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 246 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 26%
Student > Master 44 17%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 35%
Psychology 46 18%
Neuroscience 29 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#247,215
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,582
of 224,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,604
of 292,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 4,868 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,868 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.