↓ Skip to main content

It's Good to Be Different: How Diversity Impacts Judgments of Moral Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consumer Research, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It's Good to Be Different: How Diversity Impacts Judgments of Moral Behavior
Published in
Journal of Consumer Research, October 2021
DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucab061
Authors

Uzma Khan, Ajay Kalra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,419,342
of 19,144,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Research
#443
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,937
of 214,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,144,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them