↓ Skip to main content

Telomere Length and Long-Term Endurance Exercise: Does Exercise Training Affect Biological Age? A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telomere Length and Long-Term Endurance Exercise: Does Exercise Training Affect Biological Age? A Pilot Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052769
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Beate Ø. Østhus, Antonella Sgura, Francesco Berardinelli, Ingvild Vatten Alsnes, Eivind Brønstad, Tommy Rehn, Per Kristian Støbakk, Håvard Hatle, Ulrik Wisløff, Javaid Nauman

Abstract

Telomeres are potential markers of mitotic cellular age and are associated with physical ageing process. Long-term endurance training and higher aerobic exercise capacity (VO(2max)) are associated with improved survival, and dynamic effects of exercise are evident with ageing. However, the association of telomere length with exercise training and VO(2max) has so far been inconsistent. Our aim was to assess whether muscle telomere length is associated with endurance exercise training and VO(2max) in younger and older people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 168 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Sports and Recreations 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Psychology 11 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 50 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#593,515
of 25,245,273 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,108
of 219,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,297
of 293,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#151
of 4,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,245,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.