You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic use of hydroxychloroquine did not protect against COVID-19 in a large cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Rheumatology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42358-021-00217-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Ana Paula Monteiro Gomides Reis, Edgard Torres Reis-Neto, Mirhelen Mendes Abreu, Cleandro Pires Albuquerque, Nafice Costa Araújo, Ana Beatriz Bacchiega, Dante Valdetaro Bianchi, Blanca Bica, Eloisa Duarte Bonfa, Eduardo Ferreira Borba, Danielle Christinne Soares Egypto Brito, Ângela Luzia Branco Pinto Duarte, Rafaela Cavalheiro Espírito Santo, Paula Reale Fernandes, Mariana Peixoto Guimarães, Kirla Wagner Poti Gomes, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Evandro Mendes Klumb, Cristina Costa Duarte Lanna, Claudia Diniz Lopes Marques, Odirlei André Monticielo, Licia Maria Henrique Mota, Gabriela Araújo Munhoz, Eduardo Santos Paiva, Helena Lucia Alves Pereira, José Roberto Provenza, Sandra Lucia Euzébio Ribeiro, Laurindo Ferreira Rocha Junior, Camila Santana Justo Cintra Sampaio, Vanderson Souza Sampaio, Emília Inoue Sato, Thelma Skare, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Valeria Valim, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Marcelo Medeiros Pinheiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Brazil | 3 | 16% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,341,100
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Rheumatology
#10
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,067
of 436,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Rheumatology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them