↓ Skip to main content

Laser and LED phototherapies on angiogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laser and LED phototherapies on angiogenesis
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10103-012-1187-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula Cavalcanti de Sousa, Gardênia Matos Paraguassú, Nara Tayene Teixeira Silveira, José de Souza, Maria Cristina Teixeira Cangussú, Jean Nunes dos Santos, Antonio Luiz Barbosa Pinheiro

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a key process for wound healing. There are few reports of LED phototherapy on angiogenesis, mainly in vivo. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate histologically the angiogenesis on dorsal cutaneous wounds treated with laser (660 and 790 nm) or LEDs (700, 530, and 460 nm) in a rodent model. Twenty-four young adult male Wistar rats weighting between 200 and 250 g were used on the present study. Under general anesthesia, one excisional wound was created on the dorsum of each animal that were then randomly distributed into six groups with four animals each: G0-control; G1-laser λ660 nm (60 mW, ϕ ∼2 mm, 10 J/cm(2)); G2-laser λ790 nm (50 mW, ϕ ∼2 mm, 10 J/cm(2)); G3-LED λ700 ± 20 nm (15 mW, ϕ ∼16 mm, 10 J/cm(2)); G4-LED λ530 ± 20 nm (8 mW, ϕ ∼16 mm, 10 J/cm(2)); G5-LED λ460 ± 20 nm (22 mW, ϕ ∼16 mm, 10 J/cm(2)). Irradiation started immediately after surgery and was repeated every other day for 7 days. Animal death occurred at the eighth day after surgery. The specimens were removed, routinely processed to wax, cut and stained with HE. Angiogenesis was scored by blood vessel counting in the wounded area. Quantitative results showed that green LED (λ530 ± 20 nm), red LED (λ700 ± 20 nm), λ790 nm laser and λ660 nm laser caused significant increased angiogenesis when compared to the control group. It is concluded that both laser and LED light are capable of stimulating angiogenesis in vivo on cutaneous wounds and that coherence was not decisive on the outcome of the treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#865
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,741
of 169,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.