You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knots: Attractive Places with High Path Tortuosity in Mouse Open Field Exploration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Dvorkin, Henry Szechtman, Ilan Golani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 30% |
| Researcher | 21 | 23% |
| Professor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 19% |
| Psychology | 15 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,208
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,983
of 183,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#56
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.