↓ Skip to main content

Sedimentary Features of Water-Laid Volcanic Deposits and Their Classificati on Based on the Mode of Emplacement

Overview of attention for article published in Mining Geology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sedimentary Features of Water-Laid Volcanic Deposits and Their Classificati on Based on the Mode of Emplacement
Published in
Mining Geology, June 2009
DOI 10.11456/shigenchishitsu1951.20.29
Authors

Tokihiko MATSUDA, Kazuaki NAKAMURA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Mining Geology
#2
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,133
of 124,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mining Geology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.