↓ Skip to main content

秋田城跡の発堀調査成果

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association), February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
秋田城跡の発堀調査成果
Published in
Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association), February 2009
DOI 10.11215/nihonkokogaku1994.7.10_127
Authors

伊藤 武士

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#15
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,151
of 110,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Kokogaku(Journal of the Japanese Archaeological Association)
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.