↓ Skip to main content

本州東方沖北西太平洋における化石群集解析による海洋表層循環系の考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
本州東方沖北西太平洋における化石群集解析による海洋表層循環系の考察
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, December 2009
DOI 10.5575/geosoc.115.333
Authors

山本 浩文

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#85
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,279
of 178,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them