↓ Skip to main content

Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union
Published in
Ecosystem Services, December 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101359
Authors

Kenneth J. Bagstad, Jane Carter Ingram, Carl D. Shapiro, Alessandra La Notte, Joachim Maes, Sara Vallecillo, C. Frank Casey, Pierre D. Glynn, Mehdi P. Heris, Justin A. Johnson, Chris Lauer, John Matuszak, Kirsten L.L. Oleson, Stephen M. Posner, Charles Rhodes, Brian Voigt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 35 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 42 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,649,636
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#215
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,866
of 518,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.