↓ Skip to main content

Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystem Services, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union
Published in
Ecosystem Services, December 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101359
Authors

Kenneth J. Bagstad, Jane Carter Ingram, Carl D. Shapiro, Alessandra La Notte, Joachim Maes, Sara Vallecillo, C. Frank Casey, Pierre D. Glynn, Mehdi P. Heris, Justin A. Johnson, Chris Lauer, John Matuszak, Kirsten L.L. Oleson, Stephen M. Posner, Charles Rhodes, Brian Voigt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,330,243
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystem Services
#308
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,735
of 222,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystem Services
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.