↓ Skip to main content

奄美諸島・加計呂間島におけるタイマイ繁殖の初記録

Overview of attention for article published in BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
奄美諸島・加計呂間島におけるタイマイ繁殖の初記録
Published in
BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, June 2010
DOI 10.14880/hrghsj1999.2001.16
Authors

亀崎 直樹, 服部 正策, 鈴木 博

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#13
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,530
of 105,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.