↓ Skip to main content

On Conception of Sensation

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 1927
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Conception of Sensation
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 1927
DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.2.439
Authors

H Tanabe, R Kuroda, M Yokoyama, T Takagi, Koreshige Masuda, M Kido

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#125
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.