↓ Skip to main content

都市における食糧流通機構の再編 : 戦時下の米穀商企業合同における諸問題(2004年度シンポジウム 戦時日本農業像の再構成)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
都市における食糧流通機構の再編 : 戦時下の米穀商企業合同における諸問題(2004年度シンポジウム 戦時日本農業像の再構成)
Published in
The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
DOI 10.18966/joah.39.0_34
Authors

山口 由等

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,821,477
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Agricultural History
#5
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,357
of 326,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Agricultural History
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.