You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of All-Cause Mortality With Overweight and Obesity Using Standard Body Mass Index Categories: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2012.113905 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine M. Flegal, Brian K. Kit, Heather Orpana, Barry I. Graubard |
| Abstract |
Estimates of the relative mortality risks associated with normal weight, overweight, and obesity may help to inform decision making in the clinical setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 386 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 15% |
| Japan | 29 | 8% |
| Spain | 21 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 5% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Russia | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 193 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 308 | 80% |
| Scientists | 38 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2217 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 323 | 14% |
| Researcher | 307 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 291 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 253 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 166 | 7% |
| Other | 475 | 21% |
| Unknown | 482 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 692 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 185 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 114 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 108 | 5% |
| Other | 425 | 19% |
| Unknown | 609 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2359. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,477
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#116
of 36,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5
of 291,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.