You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predictive power of extubation failure diagnosed by cough strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03781-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Duan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jianping Song |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 11 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
Spain | 8 | 9% |
Brazil | 3 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 3% |
France | 3 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 43 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 76 | 83% |
Scientists | 7 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#707,316
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#490
of 6,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,905
of 438,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.