You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Residual Impact of Concurrent, Resistance, and High-Intensity Interval Training on Fasting Measures of Glucose Metabolism in Women With Insulin Resistance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.760206 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristian Alvarez, Emmanuel Gomes Ciolac, Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, David C Andrade, Manuel Vasquez-Muñoz, Matías Monsalves-Álvarez, Pedro Delgado-Floody, Alicia M. Alonso-Martínez, Mikel Izquierdo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Chile | 2 | 15% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 50 | 68% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 52 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,165,895
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,114
of 14,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,345
of 436,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#85
of 710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.