↓ Skip to main content

Posicionamento Brasileiro sobre o Uso da Multimodalidade de Imagens na Cardio-Oncologia – 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Posicionamento Brasileiro sobre o Uso da Multimodalidade de Imagens na Cardio-Oncologia – 2021
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2021
DOI 10.36660/abc.20200266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo, Marcelo Goulart Paiva, Maria Verônica Câmara Santos, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, Valéria de Melo Moreira, Mohamed Hassan Saleh, Simone Cristina Soares Brandão, Claudia Cosentino Gallafrio, Daniel Goldwasser, Eliza de Almeida Gripp, Rafael Bonafim Piveta, Tonnison Oliveira Silva, Thais Harada Campos Espirito Santo, Waldinai Pereira Ferreira, Vera Maria Cury Salemi, Sanderson A. Cauduro, Silvio Henrique Barberato, Heloísa M. Christovam Lopes, José Luiz Barros Pena, Heron Rhydan Saad Rached, Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza, Aurélio Carvalho Pinheiro, Bárbara Athayde Linhares Martins Vrandecic, Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz, César Higa Nomura, Fernanda Mello Erthal Cerbino, Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa, Otavio Rizzi Coelho, Adriano Camargo de Castro Carneiro, Ursula Maria Moreira Costa Burgos, Juliano Lara Fernandes, Marly Uellendahl, Eveline Barros Calado, Tiago Senra, Bruna Leal Assunção, Claudia Maria Vilas Freire, Cristiane Nunes Martins, Karen Saori Shiraishi Sawamura, Márcio Miranda Brito, Maria Fernanda Silva Jardim, Renata Junqueira Moll Bernardes, Tereza Cristina Diógenes, Lucas de Oliveira Vieira, Claudio Tinoco Mesquita, Rafael Willain Lopes, Elry Medeiros Vieira Segundo, Letícia Rigo, Valeska Leite Siqueira Marin, Marcelo José Santos, Gabriel Blacher Grossman, Priscila Cestari Quagliato, Monica Luiza de Alcantara, José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro, Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker, Fanilda Souto Barros, Salomon Israel do Amaral, Carmen Lúcia Lascasas Porto, Marcio Vinícius Lins Barros, Simone Nascimento dos Santos, Armando Luís Cantisano, Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco, José Eduardo Martins Barbosa, Orlando Carlos Glória Veloso, Salvador Spina, Ricardo Pignatelli, Ludhmilla Abrahão Hajjar, Roberto Kalil, Marcelo Antônio Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes, Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira, André Luiz Cerqueira Almeida

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 75%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,379,740
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#259
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,793
of 432,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.