The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Staley, Aslam Shiraz, Norman Shreeve, Andrew Bryant, Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch, Ketankumar Gajjar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Panama | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 384 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 65 | 17% |
| Unknown | 201 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 5% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 214 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,434,150
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,895
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,838
of 437,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.