↓ Skip to main content

Identification of driver genes for critical forms of COVID-19 in a deeply phenotyped young patient cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Science Translational Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 5,212)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1823 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of driver genes for critical forms of COVID-19 in a deeply phenotyped young patient cohort
Published in
Science Translational Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj7521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Carapito, Richard Li, Julie Helms, Christine Carapito, Sharvari Gujja, Véronique Rolli, Raony Guimaraes, Jose Malagon-Lopez, Perrine Spinnhirny, Alexandre Lederle, Razieh Mohseninia, Aurélie Hirschler, Leslie Muller, Paul Bastard, Adrian Gervais, Qian Zhang, François Danion, Yvon Ruch, Maleka Schenck, Olivier Collange, Thiên-Nga Chamaraux-Tran, Anne Molitor, Angélique Pichot, Alice Bernard, Ouria Tahar, Sabrina Bibi-Triki, Haiguo Wu, Nicodème Paul, Sylvain Mayeur, Annabel Larnicol, Géraldine Laumond, Julia Frappier, Sylvie Schmidt, Antoine Hanauer, Cécile Macquin, Tristan Stemmelen, Michael Simons, Xavier Mariette, Olivier Hermine, Samira Fafi-Kremer, Bernard Goichot, Bernard Drenou, Khaldoun Kuteifan, Julien Pottecher, Paul-Michel Mertes, Shweta Kailasan, M. Javad Aman, Elisa Pin, Peter Nilsson, Anne Thomas, Alain Viari, Damien Sanlaville, Francis Schneider, Jean Sibilia, Pierre-Louis Tharaux, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Yves Hansmann, Daniel Lidar, Mirjana Radosavljevic, Jeffrey R. Gulcher, Ferhat Meziani, Christiane Moog, Thomas W. Chittenden, Seiamak Bahram

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,823 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 35 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#12,141
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#39
of 5,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#524
of 514,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.