↓ Skip to main content

Huperzine A for mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Huperzine A for mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jirong Yue, Bi Rong Dong, Xiufang Lin, Ming Yang, Hong Mei Wu, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been proposed as a condition of intermediate symptomatology between the cognitive changes of ageing and fully developed symptoms of dementia. Treatment in the stages of MCI may delay the deterioration of cognitive impairment and delay the progression to dementia. Currently, the treatments for Alzheimer's disease have been focused on increasing acetylcholine levels in the brain. However, these drugs have not been proven to be effective for MCI and have numerous side effects. Huperzine A may have some beneficial effects in MCI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Psychology 17 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 32 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,968,917
of 15,355,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,539
of 11,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,434
of 260,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#302
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,355,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.