You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko, Emily Belita, Robyn L. Traynor, Emily Clark, Leah Hagerman, Maureen Dobbins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Chile | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,529,630
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#369
of 2,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,830
of 436,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.