You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Benefit of low-dose aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in septic patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11886 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maik Sossdorf, Gordon P Otto, Janina Boettel, Johannes Winning, Wolfgang Lösche |
Abstract |
ABSTRACT: Analyzing medical records of 979 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock provided some evidence that the use of low-dose aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with decreased hospital mortality. However, the benefit was abolished when aspirin and NSAIDs were given together. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,703
of 290,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#79
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.