↓ Skip to main content

OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,259)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OpenET: Filling a Critical Data Gap in Water Management for the Western United States
Published in
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, November 2021
DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12956
Authors

Forrest S. Melton, Justin Huntington, Robyn Grimm, Jamie Herring, Maurice Hall, Dana Rollison, Tyler Erickson, Richard Allen, Martha Anderson, Joshua B. Fisher, Ayse Kilic, Gabriel B. Senay, John Volk, Christopher Hain, Lee Johnson, Anderson Ruhoff, Philip Blankenau, Matt Bromley, Will Carrara, Britta Daudert, Conor Doherty, Christian Dunkerly, MacKenzie Friedrichs, Alberto Guzman, Gregory Halverson, Jody Hansen, Jordan Harding, Yanghui Kang, David Ketchum, Blake Minor, Charles Morton, Samuel Ortega‐Salazar, Thomas Ott, Mutlu Ozdogan, Peter M. ReVelle, Mitch Schull, Carlos Wang, Yun Yang, Ray G. Anderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 14 10%
Unspecified 6 4%
Professor 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 50 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 11%
Engineering 11 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 60 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,380,196
of 26,374,136 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#34
of 1,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,350
of 449,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them