You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102 |
| Authors |
David L Mitchell, William Finnegan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 51 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 12% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#389,871
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#599
of 6,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#859
of 109,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.