Comment from PubMed Commons
Chris Hafner-Eaton | May 27 2014 15:20 ESTThis study should be viewed as one "data pull" of 29 systematic reviews. In order to support the conclusions, the study must be replicated many times...
Chris Hafner-Eaton | May 27 2014 15:20 ESTThis study should be viewed as one "data pull" of 29 systematic reviews. In order to support the conclusions, the study must be replicated many times...
M Felix Freshwater | Mar 31 2014 10:38 ESTThe AMSTAR standard http://amstar.ca/Amstar_Checklist.php is 2 electronic sources. According to the Cochrane Handbook http://handbook...
Stephen E. O. Ogbonmwan | Apr 01 2014 10:47 ESTIt is scholarly wise to use more than one data base in searching for articles for review publications...
Gaétan Kerdelhué | Nov 15 2013 04:12 ESTTwo later studies confirmed a high recall of Google Scholar but argued it could not be used in realistic settings for systematic reviews...