↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of WHO Stage 3 and 4 Conditions following Initiation of Anti-Retroviral Therapy in Resource Limited Settings

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence of WHO Stage 3 and 4 Conditions following Initiation of Anti-Retroviral Therapy in Resource Limited Settings
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea J. Curtis, Catherine S. Marshall, Tim Spelman, Jane Greig, Julian H. Elliot, Leslie Shanks, Philipp Du Cros, Esther C. Casas, Marcio Silveria Da Fonseca, Daniel P. O’Brien

Abstract

To determine the incidence of WHO clinical stage 3 and 4 conditions during early anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in resource limited settings (RLS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 13 17%
Other 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 49%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,653,630
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,295
of 201,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,814
of 284,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,267
of 4,872 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,872 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.