↓ Skip to main content

Survival of the Stillest: Predator Avoidance in Shark Embryos

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
46 X users
facebook
28 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival of the Stillest: Predator Avoidance in Shark Embryos
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan M. Kempster, Nathan S. Hart, Shaun P. Collin

Abstract

Sharks use highly sensitive electroreceptors to detect the electric fields emitted by potential prey. However, it is not known whether prey animals are able to modulate their own bioelectrical signals to reduce predation risk. Here, we show that some shark (Chiloscyllium punctatum) embryos can detect predator-mimicking electric fields and respond by ceasing their respiratory gill movements. Despite being confined to the small space within the egg case, where they are vulnerable to predators, embryonic sharks are able to recognise dangerous stimuli and react with an innate avoidance response. Knowledge of such behaviours, may inform the development of effective shark repellents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 21%
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Other 10 5%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 55%
Environmental Science 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#189,779
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,813
of 217,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,236
of 295,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#42
of 4,920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.