↓ Skip to main content

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,305)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
202 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W Hurley, Meredith C B Adams, Meredith Barad, Arun Bhaskar, Anuj Bhatia, Andrea Chadwick, Timothy R Deer, Jennifer Hah, W Michael Hooten, Narayan R Kissoon, David Wonhee Lee, Zachary Mccormick, Jee Youn Moon, Samer Narouze, David A Provenzano, Byron J Schneider, Maarten van Eerd, Jan Van Zundert, Mark S Wallace, Sara M Wilson, Zirong Zhao, Steven P Cohen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 22 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#165,651
of 22,618,386 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#12
of 2,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,508
of 426,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,618,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.