↓ Skip to main content

A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial of a Traditional Chinese Herbal Formula in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial of a Traditional Chinese Herbal Formula in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhoea
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lan Lan Liang Yeh, Jah-Yao Liu, Kao-Si Lin, Yu-Shen Liu, Jeng-Min Chiou, Kung-Yee Liang, Te-Feng Tsai, Li-Hsiang Wang, Chiung-Tong Chen, Ching-Yi Huang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 23%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,048
of 199,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,784
of 67,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#126
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.