↓ Skip to main content

Health and Big Data: An Ethical Framework for Health Information Collection by Corporate Wellness Programs

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 1,177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and Big Data: An Ethical Framework for Health Information Collection by Corporate Wellness Programs
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1177/1073110516667943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ifeoma Ajunwa, Kate Crawford, Joel S. Ford

Abstract

This essay details the resurgence of wellness program as employed by large corporations with the aim of reducing healthcare costs. The essay narrows in on a discussion of how Big Data collection practices are being utilized in wellness programs and the potential negative impact on the worker in regards to privacy and employment discrimination. The essay offers an ethical framework to be adopted by wellness program vendors in order to conduct wellness programs that would achieve cost-saving goals without undue burdens on the worker. The essay also offers some innovative approaches to wellness that may well better serve the goals of healthcare cost reduction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Computer Science 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 28 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#548,487
of 22,549,926 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#35
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,372
of 493,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#5
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,549,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.