↓ Skip to main content

Approximate Bayesian Computation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
918 Mendeley
citeulike
17 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approximate Bayesian Computation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikael Sunnåker, Alberto Giovanni Busetto, Elina Numminen, Jukka Corander, Matthieu Foll, Christophe Dessimoz

Abstract

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) constitutes a class of computational methods rooted in Bayesian statistics. In all model-based statistical inference, the likelihood function is of central importance, since it expresses the probability of the observed data under a particular statistical model, and thus quantifies the support data lend to particular values of parameters and to choices among different models. For simple models, an analytical formula for the likelihood function can typically be derived. However, for more complex models, an analytical formula might be elusive or the likelihood function might be computationally very costly to evaluate. ABC methods bypass the evaluation of the likelihood function. In this way, ABC methods widen the realm of models for which statistical inference can be considered. ABC methods are mathematically well-founded, but they inevitably make assumptions and approximations whose impact needs to be carefully assessed. Furthermore, the wider application domain of ABC exacerbates the challenges of parameter estimation and model selection. ABC has rapidly gained popularity over the last years and in particular for the analysis of complex problems arising in biological sciences (e.g., in population genetics, ecology, epidemiology, and systems biology).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 35 4%
United Kingdom 16 2%
Brazil 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 824 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 247 27%
Researcher 198 22%
Student > Master 113 12%
Student > Bachelor 52 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 5%
Other 163 18%
Unknown 99 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 337 37%
Mathematics 79 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 8%
Computer Science 64 7%
Engineering 51 6%
Other 177 19%
Unknown 132 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#820,108
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#589
of 9,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,169
of 292,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.